SHADE Newsletter 12th December 2024

Welcome to the twenty eighth edition of the SHADE newsletter! 

SHADE is a research hub with a mission to explore issues at the intersection of digital technologies/AI, health and the environment. It is guided by a fundamental question: How should the balance between AI/digital enabled health and planetary health be struck in different areas of the world, and what should be the guiding principles?

The SHADE newsletter comes out every two weeks, bringing you a selection of the latest news, upcoming events, academic publications and podcasts in the SHADE space.

In this bumper edition, we highlight zoonotic surveillance and AMR, doing a round up of recent developments on each. We take a sweep through last week’s conferences, air pollution, mental health, climate and weather news, wearables and doctors’ protests. We check in on new strategies and guidelines in the SHADE space, call out the BBC and links between medical research and the fossil fuel industry. We take a joined up (ish) look at AI for and against the climate, medical research and scientific practices, risky investments and nuclear power… and much more.  

We hope you enjoy it and that it tides you over the holiday period to our next newsletter in January!

Please tell us what you like, what you don’t like and what you think is missing at [email protected]  

Highlight on Zoonotic Surveillance and AMR

News

What we’re listening to

What we’re reading

  • The Climate Action against Disinformation coalition report on how ‘the expansion of AI is a climate problem being sold as a climate solution’, a point echoed in this SHADE authored blog from the Ada Lovelace Institute, which also contrasts the frenzied investment in AI with the dearth of action on AI’s environmental impacts.

  • Meanwhile this episode from the Nature podcast (see more in ‘what we’re listening to’ above) and this preprint describing an AI-human Virtual Lab provide recent illustrations of the AI expansion phenomenon in medical research. The explosive growth comes despite calls in other areas of medical research, such as neuroimagjng, for better experimental design and hence replicability in the era of big data and AI - calls for ‘quality, rather than quantity’.

  • Quality not quantity would also be in the interests of the environment as this paper in PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, estimating the carbon footprint of research in Earth, environment and space sciences, illustrates. The paper goes on to look at how “a deeper transformation of scientific practices, away from competitive, grant-based and innovation-oriented current practices” could make substantial reductions in these footprints.

  • This is unlikely to be a welcome message for Ian Hogarth, the chair of the UK’s AI Safety Institute. Writing in the FT he asks Can Europe build its first trillion-dollar start-up? He believes that the “the key is to cherish the role of experienced founders” and “celebrate when they fund the riskiest and most important tech”.

  • Ian Hogarth also suggests that one area in which Europe can be optimistic (about its chances of building its first trillion-dollar start-up) is in nuclear fusion. An immersive piece in Nature tells the story of an historic milestone that has sparked fresh interest in nuclear fusion. The piece concludes, however, that nuclear fusion is “still a science programme, not an engineering programme” and as such, despite its ‘almost negligible carbon emissions’ it is highly unlikely to save the planet, or at least the planet as we know it.

  • It doesn’t look as though conventional nuclear fission will either, according to an article from Beyond Fossil Fuels, which highlights how the AI boom means that data centres could drain Europe’s power supplies and threaten climate action. (This point is backed up by an article in The Journal on Ireland's data centres turning to fossil fuels after maxing out country's electricity grid). The Beyond Fossil Fuels article characterizes ‘unproven Small Modular Reactors’, which would use conventional nuclear fission, as one of ‘Big Tech’s ‘faux green’ solutions’, incapable of addressing ‘the immediate, large-scale emissions caused by data centre expansion’.

  • Finally this article from Nature highlights that ‘we need space to ask ‘why AI’ in the context of many pressing social and ecological challenges'. The article examines what ‘open’ AI really means and how, open or not, AI development is still in the hands of powerful companies driven by commercial interests and not the needs of the public.

Events

  • Medical Students for a Sustainable Future (MS4SF) are holding their annual research symposium Climate Health Equity Day: Our Planet, Our Patients, Our Future in collaboration with The Medical Society Consortium on Climate and Health (MSCCH) at their 2025 Annual Meeting on March 1, 2025. This will be a hybrid event held at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, D.C. and online via Zoom.

Opportunities

  • The call for abstracts for the DHIS2 Annual Conference in June is open. Themes include DHIS2 for Climate and Health. The deadline for submissions is February 2nd.

  • Join the Digital Health and Climate working group to build responsible digital health for a heating planet. Instructions on joining are at the end of this Digital Health and the Climate Crisis Overview 2024.

  • If you are interested in presenting at the MS4SF event (see ‘Events’ above) on March 1st, fill out this abstract form by January 1st at 11:59 pm ET.

  • Faculty at institutions offering medical training are invited to participate in this inaugural survey assessing climate and health education within medical training programs. Survey results will contribute to an annual metric for the Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change.

We hope you have enjoyed this newsletter. If it has been forwarded to you, and you would like to receive future editions, you can subscribe here